Plasma International and Blood Plasma Transfusions Case Study

Plasma International and Blood Plasma Transfusions - Case Study Example Blood most especially the one provided through donations by third world countries at a low price should not be sold back to them at exorbitant prices. Blood should be available to anyone at any time without charge or obligation because donors don’t gain preference over non-donors. I don’t agree with the writer because human blood, just like any other human body part should come at a price. People pay to replace their kidneys, arms, eyes knees even heart valves. Just like blood other body parts are as important so I don’t see why when it comes to the donation of blood it should be different. Just because blood comes from human who can continuously produce more, doesn’t mean one can collect it freely(Zimmer.Preston n.d) There are many things involved before, during and after someone is transfused with blood that is costly. Starting with purchasing needles, collection bags, sterilizers, vacuum containers, equipment for laboratory testing to verify the purity of the blood. Medical practitioners, as well as the supplies they use like lab coats, latex gloves, and protective equipment, need to be purchased. Also, transportation cost from the donor to the recipient should not be left out. According to me, it’s not unethical if the company k eeps the price to receive donor blood affordable to the recipient. And as long as it operates legally, it’s fine with me. After all, medicine nowadays is profit generating as any other. The existence of blood market does not threaten the right to donate freely (Zimmer.Preston (n.d) There are facts that contradict my argument, the fact that marketing threatens all rights to receive freely donated blood. The commercialization of blood discourages voluntary blood donors; someone will be reluctant to donate freely knowing very well that someone will be financially profitable out of it (Paying donors and the ethics of blood supply. n.d.).  Still, it seems likely that  when suppliers get paid, the would-be non-cash donor losses the sense that their contribution is necessary (Güceri, Fridman   & North Atlantic Treaty Organization, 2008).